Islamic legal thought demonstrates how a pre-modern intellectual tradition can still engage meaningfully with cutting-edge technologies
In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, questions about how artificial intelligence (AI) should be governed are increasingly urgent.
The “AI and Faith” podcast brings together technologists, legal scholars, and religious thinkers to explore how ancient wisdom traditions can inform modern ethical dilemmas. One recent conversation between host Pablo and legal scholar Salah Al-Din examined how Islamic legal theory-particularly Sharia-can provide a structured ethical lens for thinking about AI.
Far from being a rigid legal code frozen in time, the discussion reframes Sharia as a dynamic interpretive framework that has historically adapted to new technologies, from telegraphs to satellite television-and now to AI.
Sharia: More Than a Fixed Legal Code
A central theme of the conversation is correcting common misconceptions about Islamic law. Sharia is often perceived as a strict, unchanging rulebook. However, as Salah explains, the term Sharia literally means “the path”-a guiding framework rooted in the Quran and the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad.
Rather than functioning as a single codified system, Sharia includes:
The Quran, considered the foundational revelation
Prophetic traditions (Sunnah), which record the sayings and practices of the ProphetA broad ethical and spiritual worldview that spans worship, morality, law, and social conduct
Alongside Sharia sits fiqh, the human interpretation of Islamic law. Fiqh is not fixed; it evolves through scholarly reasoning and differs across regions, schools of thought, and historical contexts.
A third important concept is the fatwa, an advisory legal opinion issued by scholars in response to specific questions-such as whether a financial transaction or a new technology is permissible.
Together, these concepts form a system that is not only legal but deeply interpretive and adaptive.
Technology Through an Ethical Lens
The podcast highlights a crucial insight: Islamic legal reasoning has always had to respond to technological change without explicit textual guidance.
Salah describes how scholars historically dealt with questions not mentioned in foundational texts. When new technologies emerge-whether printing presses, telegraphs, television, or AI-scholars rely on interpretive principles rather than direct scriptural references.
A key historical example discussed is the introduction of satellite television in parts of the Middle East. At the time, some religious authorities issued fatwas declaring satellite dishes impermissible (haram), fearing moral harm from unrestricted content. Yet over time, satellite TV became widespread, normalized, and even diversified to include both conservative religious programming and secular entertainment.
The lesson is not simply that religious rulings change-but that ethical evaluation of technology is always mediated through context, interpretation, and social impact.
The Five Ethical Objectives of Sharia
A major analytical tool in Islamic jurisprudence is the concept of maqasid al-sharia-the higher objectives or purposes of law. These provide a framework for evaluating whether something benefits or harms society.
They are commonly summarized as protecting:
Faith (religion) – preserving spiritual practice and belief
Life – safeguarding human life and wellbeing
Intellect – protecting human reasoning and knowledge
Wealth – ensuring fair economic and property systems
Lineage and honor – preserving family structure and social integrity
When applied to AI, these categories become a lens for ethical evaluation:
Does AI strengthen or undermine religious practice and meaning?
Does it protect or endanger human life (e.g., in healthcare or warfare)?
Does it enhance understanding or contribute to misinformation?
Does it create equitable economic value or concentrate wealth unfairly?
Does it preserve dignity, identity, and social trust?
These questions shift the debate from “Is AI good or bad?” to “In what ways does AI promote or harm essential human goods?”
Custom and Analogy: Law as Living Interpretation
Another key insight from the discussion is that Islamic legal reasoning incorporates custom (‘urf) and analogy (qiyas).
Custom refers to the collective practices of societies and industries. This means that technological norms-how people use AI, regulate it, and integrate it into daily life-can themselves become sources of ethical reasoning.
Analogy allows scholars to extend principles from past cases to new ones. For example, rules about intoxicants were extended beyond specific substances to include any mind-altering agents.
This method is especially relevant for AI, where direct scriptural references do not exist. Instead, scholars ask: What is AI most similar to in its effects, and what principles apply to that analogy?
Historical Parallels: From Telegraphs to AI
One of the most striking parts of the conversation is a historical reference to a 1911 scholarly text discussing whether telegraph messages could be trusted for religious rulings such as confirming the start of Ramadan.
The concern at the time was epistemological: How do we know information transmitted through technology is reliable?
This mirrors modern concerns about AI:
Hallucinations and misinformation
Lack of transparency in data sources
Trust in automated systems
Authenticity of generated content
Just as scholars once debated whether telegraphs could be trusted, today’s debates center on whether AI-generated outputs can be relied upon in legal, religious, or ethical decision-making.
AI in Contemporary Islamic Practice
Today, responses to AI within Muslim communities are diverse and evolving.
Three broad approaches emerge:
- Restrictive Approach
Some argue AI should be avoided due to risks of misinformation, moral harm, or misuse-similar to early resistance to television or satellite media.
- Alternative Development
Others advocate building “ethical alternatives,” such as Islamic-focused media platforms or AI systems trained on religious texts and values.
Examples include emerging large language models developed in regions such as the Gulf, as well as nonprofit-driven tools focused on Islamic knowledge and finance.
- Regulatory and Ethical Integration
A third approach focuses on developing guidelines that allow AI use while aligning it with ethical principles. This mirrors how Islamic finance operates within global banking systems-often adapting rather than replacing existing structures.
New Ethical Challenges: Representation and Authenticity
The conversation also raises sensitive issues unique to AI:
Generating images or videos of religious figures, which is traditionally prohibited in Islamic contexts
Creating synthetic depictions of sacred events
The risk of AI fabricating religious texts or misquoting scripture
These challenges are not merely technical-they are deeply theological and ethical, touching on questions of reverence, authenticity, and authority.
As Salah notes, misuse or misunderstanding of AI in religious contexts could easily lead to strong prohibitions if perceived as violating core values.
Ancient Frameworks, New Questions
The central insight from the podcast is not that Islamic law provides ready-made answers to AI-but that it offers a structured ethical methodology for grappling with uncertainty.
By emphasizing:
public benefit and harm
long-standing ethical objectives
interpretive reasoning
and the role of custom and analogy
Islamic legal thought demonstrates how a pre-modern intellectual tradition can still engage meaningfully with cutting-edge technologies.
Ultimately, the conversation suggests that AI ethics-whether religious or secular-may depend less on inventing entirely new moral systems and more on revisiting the deep, time-tested question: How do we ensure that powerful tools serve human flourishing rather than undermine it?
Courtesy: IslamiCity
